CCTV cameras in the workplace: what are the constitutional limits?

The ruling of February 2026 confirms that the installation of CCTV cameras is not, in itself, unconstitutional, provided that it serves legitimate purposes: security of property, protection of assets, access control or the prevention of incidents.

However, organisations must comply with key requirements: informing staff of the existence of the systems, restricting access to recordings, avoiding filming in areas that compromise privacy, and ensuring that the measures are proportionate and reasonable.

The ruling distinguishes between constitutional challenges and disputes that must be addressed through ordinary legal channels, particularly where allegations are made of abuses of managerial powers or disciplinary matters.

Furthermore, the Chamber recognises that monitoring systems can serve as tools for prevention and as evidential support in organisations facing operational risks, managing sensitive assets or dealing with the public, provided this is always within the bounds of proportionality.

Practical recommendation: Review your video surveillance, data protection and internal control policies. Ensure you have clear protocols in place regarding access to, use, storage and circulation of images captured by cameras, as well as guidelines to prevent uses that could give rise to labour or reputational risks.